"Welcome!" AOL Instant Messenger has been both beneficial and detrimental in the lives of millions of people. It has allowed them to effortlessly, conveniently and comfortably, create, maintain, and develop relationships. However, depending on one's self-discipline and views of chatting online in moderation, relationships can be created, maintained, and developed with too much effort, inconvenience, and discomfort.
Sure, Instant Messenger is a lot of fun. From the start, you create your own screen name, if it doesn't already exist. Then, you set up your buddy list, including the screen names of people you know. You can have nearly one hundred buddies categorized on your list. Choosing your personal preferences comes next and the options are numerous. You can even set up your chat sessions with your favorite styled text and background color. Finally, you're ready for the real fun.
You can communicate with people who have the program anywhere in the world. Keep in touch with your friends and family from home, or do a short search and find someone online in Australia. The possibilities are endless. The latest version of IM even allows you to share computer files. Nevertheless, the significance of the program is the communication aspect. Whoever said "You can't have too much of a good thing" was wrong. You certainly can, but it just may not be good.
AOL Instant Messenger can be a wonderful application, but it can also be unhealthy if you become addicted to it. As nice as IM is with its ease of use, free membership, and convenient and comfortable chatting capabilities, such attractiveness can make someone dependent on it.
Imagine a student returning to their room after a long day of class. First, he checks his voicemail. Then he checks his e-mail. And finally, he goes for it: he accesses his buddy list to see who's online. (If he had left the program running during the day, an away message could have been posted to notify other users as to where he went.) So, the student does see a few of their buddies listed online, and oh, what the hell, he'll just say hello.
It would be nice if they sent a quick hello to one person on their list, but sometimes a simple hello can develop into a long, drawn out chat session. And if more than one person is sent such an invitation to chat, imagine the number of hours that could be spent sitting at a computer monitor. Unfortunately, the machine becomes a technical IV, slowly feeding information to the student while maintaining their dependency. Why does this happen? AOL IM is such a wonderful program that some users never get enough of it. Tolerance is not a consideration for it doesn't exist.
Instant Messenger is so convenient and easy to use that it can become a dangerous procrastination tool. Take another student, who takes a study break every time she hears a buddy get online, wants to ask a friend a quick question, or decides to send a brief smile to a family member. Eventually she gets back to what she was doing, but an hour of her life has already passed her by. The quick emotional high she may get from sending several hellos isn't what feeds the addiction, though. It's the amount of time spent chatting that feeds it.
It's the 90s. I know a guy who met a girl on campus and gave her both his phone number and AOL screen name. She eventually sent him one of those AOL hellos. After two months, they were still chatting online, never having gotten past their monitors because it was a very safe way for her to communicate. If chatting online is preferred over speaking on the telephone, conflict can occur. Sure, some people express themselves better by typing out words at their convenience than having to actually speak to someone at a normal rate of speed. Having AOL as an option to communicate conditions people to avoid using the telephone and users become even more dependent. AOL begins as a convenient form of communication, but often becomes an inefficient and ineffective way to maintain relationships with people.
One-hour of chatting online equals about fifteen minutes speaking on the phone or in person. This is due to users waiting for responses, needing to fix typos, and typing slowly. There are also miscommunications. If you thought e-mails sometimes project mixed messages, imagine the conflict that can occur in chat sessions. Questions can be answered a few moments too late and comments could have double meanings. After ten minutes of determining what was originally implied, the participants may be back to where they started: at hello.
The solution to avoiding the problem of AOL addiction is to limit the amount of time spent online. Additionally helpful is selecting a certain number of buddies that you want to chat with the most. "So easy to use, no wonder it's number one" is their slogan. However, AOL Instant Messenger is so good, no wonder it took me two years to come clean, break the habit, and send it to the recycle bin. "Goodbye!"
Jared Meyer is a senior finance major presently spending the summer in NYC. Reach him at jmmeyer@wam.umd.edu.
------
Reproduced With Permission © Copyright 1999 - Maryland Media, Inc.
